Tweet
Hello RadovanK !
The church of Szalatnak was a branch of Bikal until 1763, from there until 1798 independently, from 1799 until 1805 a branch of Köblény, and finally from 1806 independently again. So you can look in the books of Bikal and Köblény as well.
The first church book of Szalatnak was burned in 1798, so many important data (from 1764 - 1798) are irretrievably lost.
If you have found the marriage of Peter Klotz in Vardomb and there are no additional informations, such as parents or anything else, there are small chances to find the line back in the church books.
Maybe there are traces in tax conscriptions or other sources.
I have all, or at least nearly all, names in Szalatnak, that I could find in the church books of Szalatnak, Köblény and Bikal. There are people with the Name Klotz / Klocz, but no Peter Klotz in this age. That means not, that there was none, but only there can be no data found in the church books of Szalatnak or wherever Szalatnak belonged to.
The next point is, the married couple is very often only mentioned in the church where the bride came from and not of the groom as well.
Do you have the exactly date of his marriage ?
(My English is not the best, but I hope you'll understand what I mean.)
Regards
The church of Szalatnak was a branch of Bikal until 1763, from there until 1798 independently, from 1799 until 1805 a branch of Köblény, and finally from 1806 independently again. So you can look in the books of Bikal and Köblény as well.
The first church book of Szalatnak was burned in 1798, so many important data (from 1764 - 1798) are irretrievably lost.
If you have found the marriage of Peter Klotz in Vardomb and there are no additional informations, such as parents or anything else, there are small chances to find the line back in the church books.
Maybe there are traces in tax conscriptions or other sources.
I have all, or at least nearly all, names in Szalatnak, that I could find in the church books of Szalatnak, Köblény and Bikal. There are people with the Name Klotz / Klocz, but no Peter Klotz in this age. That means not, that there was none, but only there can be no data found in the church books of Szalatnak or wherever Szalatnak belonged to.
The next point is, the married couple is very often only mentioned in the church where the bride came from and not of the groom as well.
Do you have the exactly date of his marriage ?
(My English is not the best, but I hope you'll understand what I mean.)
Regards
Kommentar